« Guest Blogger: Stefanie Lindquist |
| The Difficulty of Modeling Leadership and Sincerity (or Why Democrats Might Fail Again in 2006) »
See one answer here.
Posted by Michael Heise on May 21, 2006 at 11:07 PM in Weblogs | Permalink
OK, I'll bite. To Jason's question, yes, law students should take (and law schools should offer) a basic statistics course tailored to law and legal issues.
To the source post (by Yiar Listokin over at PrawfsBlawg -- "Why Statistics Should be Mandatory for Law Students"), however, I do not agree. Even though I agree with all of Yiar's points I am not yet persuaded that they make the case for *requiring* law students to take such a stats course (or, in the alternative, making "a course in statistics a prerequisite for law school"). More law schools adding an empirical methods course to their offerings as an elective (upper-level or first-year) would represent helpful and significant progress in this regard.
Michael Heise |
May 22, 2006 at 08:55 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.