« 3:3 JELS (Nov. 2006) | Main | The Role of Law Clerks in the Certiorari Process »

29 November 2006


Bill Mock

In effect, your research displays the inefficiency, at least with respect to the regulation of clean water and emission violators, of information intermediaries, including the government regulators. It would appear that no market has arisen to bridge the gap between the filed-but-unmailed disclosures and the consumers. This is unlike what happens in, for example the securites industry, where many, many types of required federal filings are monitored by investment advisors and immediately sliced-and-diced for explanation to their paying clients and, through them, the market.

In your research, it appears that no such liquid secondary information market has emerged, despite the importance of clean water. The question is then "Why?" and some possible answers would be (a) clean water is not as valuable as equities (or at least you can't make as much money off of it), so the costly information tools don't arise; or (b) it is, or is considered, more effective to engage in rent-seeking for regulation in an environmental context, and rent-seeking has different time horizons than profit-seeking, so the information needs are different and no rapid-response information market arises; or (c) market structures differ so that it is harder to identify who would benefit and pay for the services of market intermediaries in the environmental context, perhaps because of the differing perceptions of profit-seeking versus rights-assertion. Generally seeking, one doesn't mind spending money to make money. On the other hand, one often resents having to spend money to hang on to what is perceived as a birthright, whether it be a family heirloom or potable water.

Interestingly, it would appear that the information about violations does have some market value, since your research indicates that the release produces measurable change when mailed directly to consumers. This at least suggests that there is some potential for information arbitrage where there is no mandate for direct consumer disclosure but the information is public.

The comments to this entry are closed.


February 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Site Meter

Creative Commons License

  • Creative Commons License
Blog powered by Typepad