One of the principal aims of our study was to begin a conversation about the law review selection process and provide some empirical data to make that conversation more meaningful. We are extremely pleased that to some extent that conversation has taken place over the last two days. We hope it will continue. Our study certainly raised many more questions than it answered.
I, also, would like to extend a sincere "thank you" to Bill Henderson for allowing us to participate in this online forum and to those who have posted comments on our work and its implications. Those comments have been extremely helpful and have given us much to think about as we continue to rework our manuscript.