« Efforts to Clarify Instrumental Variables | Main | Marquette Martini Party at AALS »
December 11, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b58069e200e54fb3082c8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Future of Law Reviews:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Editors
Recent Posts
- Federal Judges' Citations to Legal Scholarship
- Call For Papers: Midwest Law & Economics Association
- Empirical Legal Scholars and "Special" Responsibilities
- Helpful Reminders on How To Minimize Errors in Empirical Research
- (Re-)Defined Data
- CELS 2013: Call For Papers
- Replication, Replication, Replication
- Who "Owns" History?
- More Workshops: Conducting Empirical Legal Scholarship
- Emerging Data on Stata's YouTube Channel
Recent Comments
- Wilson on USN 2014 Rankings
- HyQuizodenm on Announcement: Visiting Scholars at The Center for the Study of Law and Society
- JDH on MA v. HHS and En Banc Review
- Sakshi on Bias in ABA Judicial Performance Evaluations
- Ray Ban Aviator on American Bar Foundation (ABF) Call for Visiting Scholars
- web site promotion on American Bar Foundation (ABF) Call for Visiting Scholars
- Ella on Blog Roundup: Pedigree and Performance
- mt on Blog Roundup: Pedigree and Performance
- SaraBenesh on The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research
- Eric Rasmusen on Law & Economics (v. Finance) & the Future of Corp Law Scholarship
ELS Links
- American Bar Foundation
- Center for the Study of Law & Society (UC Berkeley)
- ELS Bibliography
- IRB FAQs
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
- Journal of Judgment and Decision Making
- Jurimetrics
- Law & Social Inquiry
- Law & Society Review
- Northwestern ELS Colloquium
- SSRN
- STATA
- State Politics & Policy Quarterly Data Resource
- Statistical Computing Resources at UCLA Academic Technology Services
- The Centre for Socio-Legal Studies
- The Journal of Law & Economics
- The Journal of Legal Studies
- The Law and Society Association
Databases
- Attributes of U.S. Appeals Court Judges, 1801-1994
- Bureau of Justice Statistics
- FJC Biographies of Federal Judges
- ICPSR
- Keith Poole NOMINATE Data
- Litigating EU Law Data
- Lower Federal Court Confirmation Database
- Martin & Quinn Supreme Court Ideal Point Research
- Merged Phase I and Phase II Supreme Court Database
- National Center for State Courts
- Songer Court of Appeals Database
- Spaeth SCOTUS Database
- State and federal statistics query engine
- State Supreme Court Data Project
- The American Presidency Project
- The Oyez Project
- The Oyez Supreme Court Podcast
- U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
- USC Judicial Research Initiative
- Washington University Supreme Court Forecasting Project
Conferences
May 2013
Blog Roll
- Althouse
- Balkinization
- Center for the Study of Law & Society (UC Berkeley)
- Concurring Opinions
- Conglomerate
- Controlling Authority
- Environmental Law Prof Blog
- How Appealing
- Ideoblog
- Jurisdynamics
- Language Log
- Law & Econ Prof Blog
- Law & Society Blog
- Legal History Blog
- Legal Theory Blog
- Leiter's Law School Reports
- Moneylaw
- Political Science Journal Blog
- Prawfsblawg
- Ratio Juris
- SCOTUSblog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Social Science Statistics Blog
- Technology & Marketing Law Blog
- The Patry Copyright Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Truth on the Market
- University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog
As a former Articles Editor for a highly cited review, I can tell you that I would not have put in a tenth of the hours proofreading and citechecking and otherwise correcting professorial oversights if I were not allowed to engage substantively in the article selection process.
There is no incentive to do all of the drudgery editing work if a faculty review board owns content selection. I worked extremely hard (and my authors can attest to this) to perfect the articles that I picked out for publication myself.
Our journal had a great volume with no faculty involvement (other than in writing the articles.) These reforms are a solution in search of a problem, and the core issue is that professors don't trust students. You want to make arbitrary submissions but you don't want the selection process to seem arbitrary? ok.
Posted by: Corey | December 11, 2007 at 02:10 PM