« Try To Get This Study Through Your University's IRB | Main | Spaeth's S.Ct. Coding (07 Term) »
September 23, 2008
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b58069e2010534c86437970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Lingering Tulane Law Review Mess:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Editors
Special Forum: Bias and the Bar
- Amy Stiegerwalt
- Rich Vining
- ELS Editors Chris Zorn and Sara Benesh
Recent Posts
- Intriguing Use of Content Analysis
- Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
- Updated Judicial Common Space Scores
- The End of an Era: the Bi-Modal Distribution for the Class of 2008
- Dependent Data
- ECJ Database
- Call For Papers: SELS 2009
- Northwestern Continues to Build Group of Empirical Scholars
- Pace Environmental Law Review Announces Shift to Peer-Review
- Call for Papers for "Law Firm Evolution: Brave New World or Business as Usual?"
Recent Comments
- Ken Dau-Schmidt on Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
- Jack on Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
- Web Site Developers New York on Exxon Shipping, Footnote 17
- ohwilleke on Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
- MAW on Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
- penis enlargement on Research Fellow Position -- Center for the Study of the Legal Profession
- penis enlargement on Research Fellow Position -- Center for the Study of the Legal Profession
- Law School Graduate on The End of an Era: the Bi-Modal Distribution for the Class of 2008
- Jeff Yates on Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
- Bill Henderson on Law School 4.0: Are Law Schools Relevant to the Future of Law?
ELS Links
- American Bar Foundation
- Center for the Study of Law & Society (UC Berkeley)
- ELS Bibliography
- IRB FAQs
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
- Journal of Judgment and Decision Making
- Jurimetrics
- Law & Social Inquiry
- Law & Society Review
- Northwestern ELS Colloquium
- SSRN
- STATA
- State Politics & Policy Quarterly Data Resource
- Statistical Computing Resources at UCLA Academic Technology Services
- The Centre for Socio-Legal Studies
- The Journal of Law & Economics
- The Journal of Legal Studies
- The Law and Society Association
Databases
- Attributes of U.S. Appeals Court Judges, 1801-1994
- Bureau of Justice Statistics
- FJC Biographies of Federal Judges
- ICPSR
- Keith Poole NOMINATE Data
- Litigating EU Law Data
- Lower Federal Court Confirmation Database
- Martin & Quinn Supreme Court Ideal Point Research
- Merged Phase I and Phase II Supreme Court Database
- National Center for State Courts
- Songer Court of Appeals Database
- Spaeth SCOTUS Database
- State and federal statistics query engine
- State Supreme Court Data Project
- The American Presidency Project
- The Oyez Project
- The Oyez Supreme Court Podcast
- U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
- USC Judicial Research Initiative
- Washington University Supreme Court Forecasting Project
Conferences
July 2009
Blog Roll
- Althouse
- Balkinization
- Center for the Study of Law & Society (UC Berkeley)
- Concurring Opinions
- Conglomerate
- Controlling Authority
- Environmental Law Prof Blog
- How Appealing
- Ideoblog
- Jurisdynamics
- Language Log
- Law & Econ Prof Blog
- Law & Society Blog
- Legal History Blog
- Legal Theory Blog
- Leiter's Law School Reports
- Moneylaw
- Political Science Journal Blog
- Prawfsblawg
- Ratio Juris
- SCOTUSblog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Social Science Statistics Blog
- Technology & Marketing Law Blog
- The Patry Copyright Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Truth on the Market
- University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog
Why aren't the freaking professors who wrote the article in a mess? Why is everything always the fault of the students, or the administration, or greedy CEOs, or something, but never the fault of a professor?
Posted by: y81 | September 26, 2008 at 10:40 PM