Not at all quite sure what to make of it, but Paul Caron touts a law blog "juice rating" here. I note it only because our ELS blog made the list (at 26th). Our ranking (such as it is) is all the more notable in that we're a relatively new blog, dwell on the substantive (save for this post), and focus on the discrete--though palpably growing--empirical legal studies field.

Unfortunately for our showing at #26, he did not do a systematic ranking of all law blogs. He just ranked those he himself visits regularly. Here is what an update to the post says:
"Update #2: To make clear: I did not purport to do a systematic "Juice Ranking" of all law professor blogs. The post explicitly says that it is a ranking of "various law professor blogs." These are blogs I visit regularly. In addition, as Steve [Bainbridge] pointed out, there is a generic problem in the Juice Rankings because they depend on the url used and do not aggregate various alternative urls for some blogs."
Posted by: William Ford | 14 October 2006 at 11:24 AM