Neil Buchanan (GWU) uses U. Mich. Law School alum data in his paper that explores the complex relation between gender and lawyer salaries. His paper reports that:
"... fathers
tend to receive higher salaries than non-fathers (a "daddy bonus"). In
addition, mothers earn less than non-mothers (a "mommy penalty"). There
is also some statistical support for the inference that there is a
penalty associated purely with gender (women earning less than men,
independent of parenthood), another result that is unique to the
literature.
Analyzing
full- or part-time status as well as work hours also suggests a key
difference between women and men. Those who take part-time status are
almost entirely women who take on child-rearing duties, and they reduce
their work hours by an average of approximately thirty percent. These
statistical results are, however, significantly less reliable because
of the very small numbers of respondents (male or female) who work less
than full time."
Mom - It's a penalty when compared to what happens to dads in the same situation. They get a bonus, while women get a penalty. It's not children that are the penalty, but the result on the salary of having children.
Posted by: bluebook | 02 November 2008 at 06:36 PM
why call it a 'mommy penalty' when i chose to step out of the work force and have not a penalty but a child? i'd love to comment further but i am going to take my 'penalty' to the playground.
Posted by: mom | 20 October 2008 at 04:29 PM