Efforts to compare the means from two sample populations with a standard t-test invariably bump into a "paired" versus and "unpaired" decision. Whether a "paired" or "unpaired" comparison is appropriate pivots on a subtle distinction that can be difficult to describe. A recent Statalist discussion might provide a helpful way to think about this distinction.
The discussion (here) began with the following (edited) question: "If there is economic growth data about two countries over the same thirty years, should it be considered as paired or unpaired data for two sample t-test?"
The various responses included the following: "For unpaired tests imagine 30 men and 30 women completely unrelated and compare their heights. You are comparing the mean male height and mean female height and the context is the variability of male heights and of female heights. For paired tests imagine 30 heterosexual married couples and compare height for each husband with each wife."
With this in mind, the answer to the question posed is: "Your panel example is still paired because there is pairing by years."
Recent Comments